I'm not sure which tunnel reopening appeal is more bonkers....Queensbury or Rhondda?
£35 million for a cycle tunnel from nowhere to nowhere, on a tunnel that encountered continuous problems from the start of construction and ended up filled with 15 million litres of murky soup, with dangerously weakened shafts close to built up areas (that would need to somehow be repaired to prevent cyclists flopping off their bikes from low oxygen levels).
The purported benefits sound like good-naturwishful thinking: "
It would, as the England's (sic)
longest reused railway tunnel, attract visitors from far afield", "
It would make it one of the most spectacular foot/cycle paths anywhere in the country", etc. Because people visit the Yorkshire countryside to cycle through a damp hole in the ground for a mile and a half?
The best bit is that much of the support has come from Queensbury village, despite the fact that the tunnel would allow cyclists, tourists etc to
bypass their village entirely...
Looking at these latest snaps, I think the £35,000,000 figure sounds more realistic than £3,500,000.
Cracking pics though, I would've chickened out and done a 180 at the first big collapse :O